Daly

Daly v. Exxon Corp.

Caution
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 396·55 Cal. App. 2d 39·55 Cal. App. 4th 39·63 Cal. Rptr. 2d 727·97 Daily Journal DAR 6462
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 1997B093106California1,964 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Here we promote the laudatory legislative goal of providing a safe workplace for employees. An employee who makes a bona fide complaint about working conditions or work practices should suffer no adverse employment consequences.

Paula J. Daly appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to her fourth amended complaint for wrongful termination. The trial court ruled that Daly did not state a cause of action arising out of her employer’s decision not to renew a one-year employment contract. We reverse and hold that Labor Code section 6310, subdivision (b), provides a statutory remedy where an employer unlawfully discriminates by not renewing an employment contract because the employee has made a bona fide complaint about unsafe work conditions.

Facts and Proceedings

In 1989 Daly was hired by Exxon Company, U.S.A. Corporation, a division of Exxon Corporation (Exxon), to provide emergency medical services at the Las Flores Canyon Oil Treatment Facility. The written employment contract, entitled “Consulting Agreement,” was for a one-year term and provided that Exxon could renew the contract at its option. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.