Brown

Brown v. Smith

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 452·55 Cal. App. 2d 767·55 Cal. App. 4th 767·64 Cal. Rptr. 2d 301·97 Daily Journal DAR 7259
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 1997D020282California9,417 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Defendants Eugene T. Smith (Smith or Mr. Smith) and his wife, Nenita M. Smith (Mrs. Smith), appeal the judgment for compensatory and punitive damages and attorney fees awarded against them after a jury trial on a complaint by plaintiffs Stephanie Brown (Brown or Mrs. Brown) and her husband, Lewis Brown (Mr. Brown), former tenants at the Smiths’ apartment building. Plaintiffs alleged Smith, their landlord, sexually harassed Brown in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.), and in violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, §§51, 52) (the Act), and that this conduct was negligent and caused Mr. Brown loss of consortium damages. Finding against the Smiths on all theories, the jury awarded Brown $110,000 general damages, $68,000 punitive damages, attorney fees of $50,000, and costs. Mr. Brown received $500 damages for loss of consortium.

On appeal, the Smiths contend the Browns were not entitled to an independent statutory remedy for sexual harassment on the grounds that the conduct alleged did not fall within the scope of either FEHA or the Act. The Smiths also challenge the admission of evidence showing other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.