Laird

Laird v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.

Bad Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 1035·68 Cal. App. 4th 727·80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 454·98 Daily Journal DAR 12739·78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1657
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 15, 1998C027975California4,770 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Plaintiff Anne Laird was terminated from her sales position with the PennySaver, a publication owned by Sutton Industries, Inc. (Sutton). She sued defendant Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. (Cap Cities), Sutton’s parent corporation, alleging employment discrimination and wrongful termination. She did not name Sutton as a defendant.

Cap Cities moved for summary judgment on the ground that it was not Laird’s employer. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint. Laird appeals. We shall affirm.

Factual And Procedural Background

The complaint.

Laird’s complaint stated causes of action for sex discrimination, age discrimination, and wrongful termination in breach of an implied-in-fact contract of employment based on the following allegations: Defendant Cap Cities hired her in 1986 as an account sales representative at its Sacramento office, where she was a top producer. However, after a promotion in 1992 to the national accounts department, things went wrong. Male counterparts in the department were favored over her, causing her to lose accounts and income. When she complained to defendants Sandy Kleinke (described as Cap Cities’ sales manager) and Wes Smith…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.