Rancho Publications v. Superior Court

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 16·68 Cal. App. 4th 1538·81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 274·99 Daily Journal DAR 307·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 288
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 1999G023316California5,140 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crosby, J.

The right to speak anonymously draws its strength from two separate constitutional wellsprings: the First Amendment’s freedom of speech and the right of privacy in article I, section 1 of the California Constitution. The anonymous pamphleteer is one of the enduring images of the American revolutionary heritage.

Publius, Cato and Brutus find their modern-day counterparts in “Save Our Hospital,” a group which paid to run numerous advertisements in a local newspaper criticizing a local community hospital. The hospital used a preexisting civil lawsuit to find out who authored them. The reason? It suspected the same people previously distributed other anonymous documents of an allegedly defamatory nature.

We draw upon a well-established body of California case law which allows nonparties to civil litigation (such as a newspaper) to assert the constitutionally protected rights of an author to remain unknown. Applying a balancing test, we issue a writ because the speculative relationship between this anonymous speech and other statements which are alleged to be defamatory does not justify judicially compelled disclosure by a third party. Anonymity, once lost, cannot be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.