Jackson v. Paramount Pictures Corp.

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 984·68 Cal. App. 4th 10·80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 1·98 Daily Journal DAR 12097·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8730
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 1998B114354California7,736 words

Opinion

Opinion

Curry, J.

Appellant Michael Jackson brought suit against respondents Paramount Pictures Corporation, Diane Dimond, and Stephen Doran, alleging that he had been slandered by reports broadcast on the television program Hard Copy and in a radio interview with Dimond. During these broadcasts, the search for and purported existence of a videotape showing appellant inappropriately touching an underage boy in a sexual manner were discussed. The trial court granted summary judgment to respondents based on the truth of the statements made in the broadcasts and the lack of evidence of malice. After review of the record and the evidence in support of and in opposition to the summary judgment motion, we affirm the trial court’s ruling.

Factual and Procedural Background

The KABC-AM Radio Broadcast

Two over-the-air reports dealt with the alleged videotape. The first occurred on January 9, 1995, on the The Ken and Barkley Show broadcast by KABC-AM radio. Respondent Diane Dimond appeared as a guest on the program. To keep the statements made in their proper context, we repeat the entire text of the interview as it related to appellant rather than rely on excerpts:

The Complaint

Appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.