Berry

Berry v. City of Santa Barbara

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1181·40 Cal. App. 4th 1075·47 Cal. Rptr. 2d 661·95 Daily Journal DAR 16107·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9267
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 1995B085586California4,200 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

We are called upon to delicately balance precious First Amendment rights against the government’s interest in protecting minors from viewing harmful matter. Wayne C. Berry, who distributes an “adult” publication from sidewalk newsracks, challenged enforcement of a city ordinance of the City of Santa Barbara (City) on the theory that it violated the United States Constitution. The trial court disagreed. We have strictly scrutinized the ordinance, section 5.66.110 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code, and conclude that, on its face, the ordinance passes constitutional muster. However, the trial court did not expressly rule on whether the front page of the subject publication is harmful to minors. We cannot affirm the judgment on the pleadings insofar as it requires “L.A. X . . . Press” to be blinded. We remand for an express determination on the issue of whether the front page of the publication is harmful to minors.

The Ordinance and Statute.

Chapter 5.66 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code regulates the registration, placement and appearance of newsracks within the City. Section 5.66.110, the only portion of chapter 5.66 which is at issue here, provides: “No material…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.