Andrews

Andrews v. Valdez

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1135·40 Cal. App. 4th 492·46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 744·95 Daily Journal DAR 15366·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8887
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 1995B083581California963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kitching, J.

Introduction

The trial court correctly issued a peremptory writ of mandate ordering the Los Angeles County Registrar to accept plaintiff’s ballot designation of her occupation as “administrative law judge.” That ballot designation reflects a title authorized by statute, accurately describes plaintiff’s occupation, and does not mislead voters. We therefore affirm the judgment.

On March 21, 1994, plaintiff Deborah B. Andrews (Andrews) filed a petition seeking a peremptory writ of mandate ordering defendant Beatriz Valdez, Los Angeles County Registrar/Recorder (Valdez), to designate Andrews’s occupation on the June 7, 1994, ballot as “administrative law judge.”

Andrews was a candidate for judge of the Long Beach Municipal Court. She designated her principal occupation as “administrative law judge,” which is her full-time, current principal occupation. She was appointed under the authority of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board.

Valdez, the officer responsible for approving and disapproving ballot designations, rejected Andrews’s designation as impermissible under California Elections Code section 10211. The petition alleged that Valdez’s office required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.