Hansen Mechanical, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1142·40 Cal. App. 4th 722·47 Cal. Rptr. 2d 47·95 Daily Journal DAR 15724·60 Cal. Comp. Cases 1177
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 29, 1995B093914California3,654 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

Hansen Mechanical, Inc. (Hansen) seeks a petition for writ of mandate to vacate the trial court’s June 14, 1995, order denying its motion for summary adjudication as to the third and fourth causes of action of the cross-complaint of cross-complainant and real party in interest Northridge Equipment Co., Inc. (Northridge), and to enter a new order granting summary adjudication in favor of Hansen. We issued an order to show cause why respondent should not be compelled to grant the relief prayed for in the petition; oral argument has been had thereon. The issue before us is whether Hansen was entitled to summary adjudication of issues as to Northridge’s claims for express indemnity, on the ground that the indemnity provision of the written agreement with Northridge is unenforceable because the agreement was not executed by Northridge within the meaning of Labor Code section 3864.

Factual and Procedural Background

The complaint herein arises out of an April 1990 construction accident involving personal injuries to Sam Martinez, an employee of Hansen. Martinez was operating a mobile scissor lift which allegedly fell into an unguarded hole in a concrete floor at a construction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.