Willard

Willard v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Caution
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1163·40 Cal. App. 4th 892·48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 607·95 Daily Journal DAR 15801·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9127
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1995F019296California10,626 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thaxter, J.

This products liability case requires our consideration of the evolving tort of intentional spoliation of evidence. Balancing relevant factors, we will hold that the trial court erred in submitting to the jury a cause of action for intentional spoliation of a manufacturer’s design documents, when the destruction occurred before the plaintiff’s injury and after the product had been on the market and in use for nearly 25 years with a negligible history of accidents similar to the plaintiff’s.

Procedural History

Blaine Willard (Willard or plaintiff) sustained serious injuries while attempting to repair a 1955 Caterpillar model D7-C crawler tractor on October 29, 1990. He sued Caterpillar and the owner of the tractor, Belluomini Farms, for his injuries, alleging causes of action for products liability and negligence. During trial, over Caterpillar’s objection, the trial court permitted Willard to amend his complaint to conform to proof and add claims for spoliation of evidence and punitive damages.

As pertinent to the issues raised on appeal, the jury returned a special verdict finding there was a defect in the design of the D7 tractor, Caterpillar was negligent, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.