Lyons

Lyons v. Security Pacific National Bank

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1172·40 Cal. App. 4th 1001·48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 174·95 Daily Journal DAR 15908·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9164
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 1995B073479California7,777 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

In this appeal, we review the judgments entered in favor of two defendant entities, Security Pacific National Bank (the Bank), and Michael Yurosek, David Yurosek and Mike Yurosek & Son (the Yuroseks), in an action brought by plaintiff Charles J. Lyons, Jr., a cosignatory with the Yuroseks on a $2,350,000 promissory note to the Bank. The complaint alleged three counts of conspiracy among defendants. According to the alleged conspiracy, the Bank agreed with the Yuroseks to seek repayment of the entire $2,350,000 from Lyons only. Meanwhile, the complaint alleged, the Yuroseks amassed a $23 million sham debt to the Bank, and then granted the Bank security interests in all of their remaining assets. Lyons alleged this preferential transfer was made for the purpose of preventing him from obtaining contribution from the Yuroseks for their share of the funds Lyons paid to the Bank in satisfaction of the $2,350,000 loan.

The Bank successfully moved for summary judgment on the ground its actions in protecting its security interest in the Yuroseks’ collateral, based on the underlying $23 million debt, were lawful with the result no conspiracy existed. The trial court then sustained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.