Noble

Noble v. Draper

Good Law
159 Cal. App. 4th 810·71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 870·8 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1514
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2008C053918California6,332 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE TEXT OF THIS MODIFIED AND REPRINTED. SEE 160 Cal.App.4th 1 .] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

In this case alleging employment relationships gone awry, plaintiffs Joaquin Noble (Noble), Jose Antonio Hernandez, Manuel Moreno, and Maria de Lourdes Rios de Noble (Maria Noble) appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants Martha Draper and Velasco, Inc., doing business as Cha-Cha's Cocina Mexicana, following the trial court's granting of defense motions for separate trial of special defenses (Code Civ. Proc., § 597 ) and for judgment on the pleadings. We shall conclude the judgment must be reversed in part, because this civil action by some of the plaintiffs (Noble and Hernandez), alleging fraudulent inducement to enter employment, is not precluded by their prior pursuit of wage claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.