Schachter

Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.

Good Law
159 Cal. App. 4th 10·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 81·70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 776
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 2008B193713California5,948 words

Opinion

Opinion

A financial brokerage company offers qualifying employees an incentive compensation plan that allows participants the option of using a portion of their annual earnings to purchase shares in the company's stock at a price below the stock's publicly-traded market price. If the participating employee resigns or is terminated for cause within a two-year vesting period, the employee forfeits the stock as well as the money used to purchase it.

Do the forfeiture provisions of this voluntary incentive compensation plan violate Labor Code sections 201 and 202, [1] which require an employer to pay its employee all earned but unpaid compensation following the employee's discharge or his or her voluntary termination of employment? As a matter of economic reality, employees who elect to participate in the plan's stock-purchase program are paid all the wages they designate to invest in company stock. Thus, the plan's forfeiture provisions do not violate the Labor Code; and the trial court in this case properly granted summary judgment in favor of the brokerage company.

David B. Schachter is a former securities salesperson for Salomon Smith Barney (Smith Barney), a subsidiary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.