In Re Gsr

Good Law
159 Cal. App. 4th 1202·72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 398
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2008B197000California5,744 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aida Aslanian, Glendale, under appointment of the Court of Appeal, for Minors.

Principles of due process require that the juvenile court not terminate a presumed father's parental rights without first finding, by clear and convincing evidence that the father is unfit. Because no such finding was made in this case, and based on our conclusion the court improperly terminated parental rights based on a father's poverty, we will reverse the order terminating parental rights and remand for reconsideration whether a proper basis for such termination exists, and if not, for renewed efforts aimed at returning the children to their father's custody. We also conclude reversal of the order terminating parental rights is required, and remand the matter, so the juvenile court may properly determine whether the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. section 1901 et seq., governs this proceeding.

In May 2004, then eight-year-old appellant G.S.R., and his six-year-old brother, appellant G.M.R. ("Michael" or, collectively, "the boys"), were detained by respondent Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) from their mother's custody after she was arrested for having sex…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.