Zevnik

Zevnik v. Superior Court

Good Law
159 Cal. App. 4th 76·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 84·70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 817
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 2008B201105California4,996 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Paul Anton Zevnik, Michel Y. Horton, Morgan Lewis and Bockius LLP (MLB), and Zevnik Horton LLP (collectively Petitioners) are defendants in a legal malpractice action brought by their former clients Rayonier Inc. (Rayonier), and Southern Wood Piedmont Company (Southern Wood). The alleged malpractice arises from Petitioners’ concurrent representation of Rayonier, Southern Wood, ITT Industries, Inc. (ITT), and ITT Fluid Technology Corporation (ITT Fluid) as coplaintiffs in an insurance coverage action. Rayonier and Southern Wood moved to disqualify Petitioners as counsel for ITT and ITT Fluid in the insurance coverage action based on alleged conflicts of interest and violations of professional responsibilities. The trial court denied the motion based on both the merits and on laches. We affirmed the denial based on laches, and did not reach the merits. Petitioners then moved in this malpractice action to determine the collateral estoppel effect of our opinion in the insurance coverage action, arguing that facts determined by the trial court in the insurance coverage action with respect to the merits of the disqualification motion are conclusively established for purposes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.