Boeken

Boeken v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

Good Law
159 Cal. App. 4th 1391·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 215·72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 454
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 2008B198220California8,464 words

Opinion

Opinion

In affirming the trial court's judgment of dismissal, we hold that the final adjudication on the merits of plaintiffs loss-of-consortium claim against defendant results in a res judicata bar of plaintiffs subsequent wrongful death action for loss-of-consortium damages against' defendant arising from the same injury to plaintiffs spouse that was the basis of the adjudicated loss-of-consortium claim.

In March 2000, Richard Boeken (Mr. Boeken), the husband of plaintiff and appellant Judy Boeken (plaintiff), brought an action against defendant and respondent Philip Morris USA, Inc. (Philip Morris) alleging that cigarettes manufactured by Philip Morris caused Mr. Boeken's terminal lung cancer. Mr. Boeken prevailed in his lawsuit and obtained a judgment against Philip Morris for $5.5 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages. (See Boeken v. Philip Morris Inc. (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1640 , 26 Cal.Rptr.3d 638 .) Philip Morris satisfied that judgment.

In October 2000, white Mr. Boeken's lawsuit was pending, plaintiff brought a separate action against Philip Morris seeking damages for loss of consortium. Plaintiff alleged that Mr. Boeken, as a result of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.