Grim

People v. Grim

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 884·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1137·9 Cal. App. 4th 1240·92 Daily Journal DAR 13104·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8052
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1992F016437California733 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

Appellant Emery Elroy Grim was convicted by jury of one count of violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (b), to wit, a lewd and lascivious act upon his son, a minor under the age of 14. The jury further found true the alleged enhancements that appellant was statutorily ineligible for probation because he occupied a position of special trust and committed an act of substantial sexual conduct upon his victim (§ 1203.066, subd. (a)(9)), and because he employed force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury in committing the section 288 violation (§ 1203.066, subd. (a)(1)).

Appellant was sentenced to prison for the middle term of six years.

Statement of Facts; Discussion

I. Substantial evidence supports a finding of the use of force.

II. The instructions and jury forms relating to the enhancement allegations were adequate.

A. Definition of “substantial sexual conduct. ”

Section 1203.066, subdivision (a)(9) bars probation for “[a] person who occupies a position of special trust and commits an act of substantial sexual conduct.”

“Substantial sexual conduct” includes oral copulation. (§ 1203.066, subd. (b).) Consequently, the jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.