Andrisani

Andrisani v. Hoodack

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 511·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1071·9 Cal. App. 4th 279·92 Daily Journal DAR 12311·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7657
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 1992B069085California704 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

Plaintiff, Albert Andrisani, has filed an application for a waiver of court costs and fees. In response to that request, this court, acting under the direction of the acting administrative presiding justice, issued an order requesting the parties to file memoranda addressing the question of whether this court should act pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 391.7 and issue a prefiling order which would prohibit the filing of new litigation by plaintiff. Plaintiff has been found to be a vexatious litigant within the meaning of section 391, subdivision (b) on two occasions in published Court of Appeal opinions. (Andrisani vs. Saugus Colony Limited (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 517 [ 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 444 ]; First Western Development Corp. v. Superior Court (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 860, 867-871 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 116 ].) An appellate court is authorized to determine that a prefiling order should be issued pursuant to section 391.7, subdivision (a) and the decision of In re Whitaker (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 54, 55-57 [ 8 Cal.Rptr.2d 289 ]. No sound reason has been advanced to preclude this court from issuing a prefiling order. Therefore, this court finds that Albert Andrisani is a vexatious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.