Dethloff

People v. Dethloff

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 814·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1106·9 Cal. App. 4th 620·92 Daily Journal DAR 12766·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7854
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 1992B064774California1,685 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

The People appeal from the superior court’s denial of their motion to reinstate a complaint, made pursuant to Penal Code section 871.5. The magistrate had dismissed the complaint after granting the motion to suppress evidence made by defendant/respondent Jeffrey L. Dethloff (respondent).

Because we conclude that the People’s section 871.5 motion was untimely and, consequently, that the superior court was without jurisdiction to consider the matter, we dismiss this appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

On December 5, 1990, pursuant to a felony complaint, respondent was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and with having suffered four prior convictions for the same offense. (Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subd. (a), and 23175.)

On September 11, 1991, the preliminary hearing was held. The evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing, in sum, revealed that respondent was arrested after being stopped by Los Angeles police officers who saw some white light emitting from the cracked taillight of his car. The officers smelled alcohol on his breath, and a field sobriety test was administered, which respondent failed. It was stipulated that the urine test…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.