McCullough

People v. McCullough

Good Law
12 Cal. Rptr. 2d 341·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1144·9 Cal. App. 4th 1298·92 Daily Journal DAR 13169·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8073
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 1992A055033California747 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

A jury found defendant Mark Donald McCullough guilty of robbery in an inhabited dwelling (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (a)), assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)) and false imprisonment (§ 236), not reaching agreement on firearm-use enhancements on each count (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)). The court then separately tried a prior-serious-felony allegation. (§§ 667, subd. (a), 1192.7, subd. (c).) Finding it true, the court denied defendant’s motion for new trial and sentenced him to an aggregate term of 11 years in state prison.

The issues raised here are those raised on the new trial motion, and their resolution does not require a detailed recital of the trial evidence.

All charges stemmed from an assault on Allen David Hawkins one night in January 1991 inside a Richmond apartment. The prosecution’s theory was that defendant beat, tied up and robbed Hawkins, with help from Billy Proffitt and 15-year-old Amy M. (who testified under immunity). Defendant’s story was that he fought with Hawkins over Amy but that Amy and Proffitt alone assaulted, bound and robbed Hawkins.

I

Defendant contends his conviction for residential robbery (§ 212.5) cannot stand because the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.