ERIKA

Erika K. v. Brett D.

Good Law
161 Cal. App. 4th 1259·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 518·75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 152
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 10, 2008A116590California4,768 words

Opinion

Opinion

Margulies, J.

Erika K. (Mother) is a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe. Due to financial difficulties, Mother left her daughter, Cecelia, in the care of a friend, Nicole Q., and moved away. Nicole thereafter assumed responsibility for Cecelia’s parenting and financial support. Four years later, Mother asked that her daughter be returned to her. When both Cecelia and Nicole resisted, Mother filed a petition for child custody. Nicole responded by joining as a party and seeking custody of Cecelia herself, but she did not petition separately to be appointed Cecelia’s guardian. Following an evidentiary hearing, the family court awarded custody of Cecelia to Nicole. While acknowledging that the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) applied to the proceedings, the family court made no findings under the ICWA because it concluded that Cecelia’s constitutional right to a stable home was paramount.

Mother contends that Nicole lacked standing to join as a party under the Family Code, that the court was precluded from awarding custody of Cecelia to a nonparent who had not been appointed Cecelia’s guardian, and that the family court erred in finding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.