Keener

Keener v. JELD-WEN, INC.

Good Law
161 Cal. App. 4th 848·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 479·75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 61
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 2008D049471California13,118 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified for Partial Publication. [*]

HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

In this wrongful death action arising from a motorcycle and truck collision, the surviving plaintiff Keener family sued the other driver involved in the accident and his employer (respectively, defendants and appellants Hector Solis and Jeld-Wen, Inc., dba Summit Window and Patio Door ("Jeld-Wen"; sometimes collectively defendants). [1] After a three-week jury trial, plaintiffs prevailed, obtaining a damages award against defendants of $3,952,000 (representing an 80 percent fault allocation to defendants pursuant to a special verdict in nine parts that answered 16 specific questions). An extensive new trial motion was denied, judgment was entered, and defendants appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 657; all further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise noted.)

Defendants chiefly argue that prejudicial error occurred when the verdict was taken, polling was conducted, and certain crucial questions and answers were omitted, resulting in a special verdict that was fatally defective for lack of sufficient votes to support the jury's conclusions on the 80/20 percent apportionment of fault (special…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.