Schneider

Schneider v. California Coastal Commission

Good Law
140 Cal. App. 4th 1339·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 986·2006 Daily Journal DAR 8429·44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 867·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20126
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2006B186149California3,474 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Here we conclude that the Legislature has not recognized an ocean boater’s “right to a view” of the coastline as a factor in regulating development. The Legislature has given the California Coastal Commission (Coastal Commission) enumerated powers to regulate such development. But the Legislature has not empowered the Coastal Commission to “add” the factor of a boater’s “right to a view” of the coastline as a factor to deny or restrict development in the coastline zone.

Dennis C. Schneider appeals from an order denying his petition for administrative mandamus to vacate a Coastal Commission decision imposing special conditions on a Coastal Development Permit to build a residence. (Pub. Resources Code, § 30801.) We reverse and direct the superior court to issue a peremptory writ commanding the Coastal Commission to set aside its decision and rehear the matter. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5, subd. (f).) On rehearing, Coastal Commission may not consider whether the proposed development impacts views of the coast from offshore, ocean-based vantage points. (See, e.g., Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1152, 1174 [ 56 Cal.Rptr.2d 223 ].)

Facts and Procedural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.