Teichert Construction v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Board

Good Law
140 Cal. App. 4th 883·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 920·2006 Daily Journal DAR 7972·44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 833·21 OSHC (BNA) 1624
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 2006C050709California3,562 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scotland, J.

Teichert Construction (Teichert) sought to overturn a decision of the California Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board (the Board) which upheld a citation issued by the California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health (the Division) for violation of a safety order, and assessed Teichert a civil penalty of $5,000. In Teichert’s view, the safety order is unconstitutionally vague, and the Board failed to determine whether Teichert’s conduct was reasonable. Teichert appeals from the superior court’s denial of its petition for a writ of administrative mandate. We shall affirm the judgment.

As we will explain, the requirement that hauling and earth moving operations “be controlled in such a manner as to ensure that equipment or vehicle operators know of the presence of . . . workers on foot in the areas of their operations” is not impermissibly vague. A reasonable and practical construction of the regulation puts businesses, like Teichert, on notice that (1) they must control hauling and earth moving operations in a manner to ensure equipment operators know of a worker’s location on foot within the immediate vicinity of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.