Brierton

Brierton v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Good Law
140 Cal. App. 4th 427·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 863·2006 Daily Journal DAR 7373·44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 480·6 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5074
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 2006D047088California5,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant John Greenwood Brierton appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of mandate seeking to prevent the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) from enforcing an April 22, 2005 order of suspension against him. Brierton contends that the DMV’s suspension of his driver’s license under Vehicle Code section 13352, subdivision (a)(3), which requires the DMV to suspend for two years the driving privileges of any person who suffers two alcohol-related (hiving offense convictions within 10 years, violates the separation of powers doctrine because it imposes a term of suspension different from the suspension the trial court imposed in Brierton’s criminal case. According to Brierton, by allowing the DMV to suspend his license for two years, the Legislature has usurped the sentencing discretion of the trial court. We reject this contention and affirm the trial court’s denial of Brierton’s petition for a writ of mandate.

n.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual background

1. Brierton’s July 2003 arrest

On July 30, 2003, a San Diego State University Police Department officer saw Brierton accelerate his vehicle and lose traction for approximately 20…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.