VIACOM OUTDOOR, INC. v. City of Arcata

Good Law
140 Cal. App. 4th 230·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 851·2006 Daily Journal DAR 7145·44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4910
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2006A110628California6,412 words

Opinion

Opinion

Busch, J.

The trial court determined that state law preempted the efforts by the City of Areata (City) to enforce its ordinances requiring permits before Viacom Outdoor, Inc. (Viacom), could rebuild a number of wind-destroyed billboards. Because it had no authority to insist on compliance with its ordinances, the City was also found to have violated Viacom’s federal civil rights. Damages and attorney fees were awarded to Viacom under federal civil rights statutes.

The primary issue presented on this appeal by the City is whether California’s Outdoor Advertising Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 5200 et seq.; the State Act) preempts municipal ordinances that require a permit for rebuilding outdoor stand-alone billboards destroyed by natural forces. We conclude this well-established local power is not displaced by the State Act. We further conclude that because the municipal ordinances are valid and enforceable, their threatened enforcement has not yet been shown to have caused actionable damage. In light of these conclusions, we reverse.

BACKGROUND

The salient facts are easily recounted. Viacom owned four billboards located within the City and adjacent to State Highway 101. For each of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.