Ramirez

People v. Ramirez

Good Law
140 Cal. App. 4th 849·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 914·2006 Daily Journal DAR 7900·44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 813·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5544
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2006B182791California1,538 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Oscar Ramirez was charged with carrying a concealed firearm (count 1) and carrying a loaded and unregistered firearm (count 2), with allegations that the offenses were committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (Pen. Code, §§ 12025, subd. (a)(2), 12031, subd. (a)(1), 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(A).) Ramirez moved unsuccessfully to suppress evidence (the firearm), and he then entered a no contest plea to count 1 and admitted the gang enhancement. Count 2 was dismissed and probation was granted. Ramirez appeals, claiming the officer lacked probable cause to stop him and that his suppression motion should have been granted. We agree and therefore reverse the judgment.

DISCUSSION

A.

As a police officer watched from his patrol car, Ramirez crossed diagonally at the intersection of Blackwelder and Cloverdale, walking toward the patrol car as it approached the intersection and then stopped at a stop sign. From previous contacts, the officer knew Ramirez (who had been the victim of a shooting) and knew he lived on a comer of the intersection he was crossing. The officer concluded that Ramirez was a “pedestrian in a roadway” and thus in violation of Vehicle Code section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.