Servantes

People Ex Rel. Renne v. Servantes

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 2d 870·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 81·2001 Daily Journal DAR 1283·86 Cal. App. 4th 1081·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1003
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 2001A089493California5,796 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Presiding Justice Harold G. Clarke of the Georgia Supreme Court observed that “[t]he law gives the towing company a great advantage over the owner of the towed car, and creates a great potential for unfair business practices and abuse of the public.” (Porter v. City of Atlanta (1989) 259 Ga. 526, 528 [ 384 S.E.2d 631, 634 ].) While that observation was made 11 years ago and some 3,000 miles away, Justice Clarke was talking about Patrick Servantes (Servantes), who over a period of years committed myriad unfair business practices and abused the public, towing hundreds of cars off private property in abject disregard of applicable California law and San Francisco regulations. Such practices included towing vehicles without a permit, towing vehicles from private property without authorization from the property owners, refusing to accept credit cards as payment for towing and storage charges to allow release of the vehicle, and imposing excessive towing and storage charges.

The City Attorney of San Francisco brought suit to curtail Servantes’s practices, alleging a claim for unfair business practices (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) and seeking a permanent injunction,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.