In Re Steven H.

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 2d 649·86 Cal. App. 4th 1023
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2001G027222California3,718 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sills, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1025 This appeal is from a judgment terminating the parental rights of Julie M. to her son Steven H. The appeal asserts the judgment must be reversed because the Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) failed to comply with the requirement of Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.23 , subdivision (b)(5)(B) 1 , that notice of the termination hearing be served on Steven's grandparents. We issued an order indicating we were considering dismissing the appeal on our own motion, on the ground that Julie herself had not authorized it. Julie's counsel filed opposition, arguing that the requirement appellant personally authorize an appeal did not apply where, as here, the appellant is a minor. Counsel also contended that dismissal of the appeal for lack of authorization was improper where the basis of the appeal is lack of proper notice to appellant in the trial court. 2 *Page 1026 We determined that the motion to dismiss would be resolved in conjunction with the merits of the appeal. Now, having considered counsel's arguments in light of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.