In Re Aaron Collins

Good Law
104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 108·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 86·2001 Daily Journal DAR 1365·86 Cal. App. 4th 1176·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1079
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 2001A090799California3,778 words

Opinion

Opinion

Strankman, J.

Inmate Classified is in the business of publishing personal Web pages on the Internet for prison inmates who subscribe to its service. Each inmate’s page includes an individual electronic (e-mail) address, and Inmate Classified periodically downloads and prints any e-mail messages received by the inmate subscriber and sends them to the inmate by regular United States mail. Aaron Collins, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison (Pelican Bay), subscribed to Inmate Classified’s service. In mid-1998, however, the warden at Pelican Bay directed that materials downloaded from the Internet would not be accepted by the prison mailroom.

Collins filed a petition for habeas corpus challenging the prohibition on First Amendment grounds, and the trial court issued an order to show cause. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court granted the petition and ordered that inmates could receive e-mail or other Internet related material sent by United States mail, subject to existing regulations governing nonconfidential inmate mail. The warden has appealed. We conclude that the ban is valid because it is “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.” (Turner v. Safley (1987)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.