Tin Tin Corp. v. Pacific Rim Park, LLC

Good Law
170 Cal. App. 4th 1220·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 136·88 Cal. Rptr. 3d 816
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 2009H032371California6,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

In this action for breach of contract and related causes of action, 12 commercial tenants alleged that their landlord, Pacific Rim Park, LLC (PRP), had been unfairly charging them the cost of its LLC (limited liability company) taxes and fees. Plaintiffs further alleged that PRP had failed to provide reasonably detailed annual statements of the expenses they were required to pay under their leases. In a cross-complaint PRP alleged that one of the tenants, Tin Tin Corporation (Tin Tin), had breached its lease by failing to remodel the premises it occupied. After a court trial, neither side recovered, and both appeal. We find merit in plaintiffs’ first argument and reverse on that ground alone.

Background

In November 2000 Steven F. Caserza formed PRP, a limited liability company, expressly to acquire and operate the Pacific Rim Park shopping center. The center was occupied by a number of business tenants anchored by Tin Tin, a grocery store. Each business rented the premises under a lease that differed in some respects from the others, but they all included one term, the “Lessee’s Share of Common Area Operating Expenses.” These “CAM” expenses (or CAM’s) were defined in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.