Pine Terrace Apartments, L.P. v. Windscape, LLC

Good Law
170 Cal. App. 4th 1·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 23·87 Cal. Rptr. 3d 630
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 2009F054609California5,386 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dawson, J.

This appeal involves allegations of latent construction defects and the application of the 10-year statute of limitations set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15.

The buyer of an apartment complex sued the developer and seller after discovering that all of the windows in the complex lacked flashing, which led to water and mold damage. The developer and seller filed a cross-complaint for indemnification against various subcontractors.

Three subcontractors moved for summary judgment on the cross-complaint on the ground it was barred by section 337.15. The superior court granted their motions. The developer and seller, as well as the buyer, appealed.

We reach the following conclusions. First, the exemption from the 10-year statute of limitations for “actions based on willful misconduct” (§ 337.15, subd. (f)) applies to cross-complaints for indemnity. Second, a willful misconduct claim may be made in a cross-complaint by way of incorporating by reference allegations contained in the complaint. Third, because of these two conclusions and because triable issues of material fact regarding the willful misconduct claim are present here, the trial court erred in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.