Anderson

People v. Anderson

Good Law
170 Cal. App. 4th 910·88 Cal. Rptr. 3d 269
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 31, 2008D050432California8,209 words

Opinion

Opinion

In June 2006 the San Diego County District Attorney charged Eli Jordan Anderson with felony hit and run resulting in death, under Vehicle Code [1] section 20001, subdivisions (a) and (b)(2). In the first trial in October 2006 the jury was unable to reach a verdict, voting seven to five in favor of acquitting Anderson, and the court declared a mistrial. In December 2006 a second trial commenced and the jury found Anderson guilty.

In February 2007 the court sentenced Anderson to 365 days in county jail, stayed that sentence pending appeal, and gave him five years' probation. The court also ordered Anderson to pay the victim's family $34,092.02 in restitution.

On appeal, Anderson asserts the court committed prejudicial error by (1) excluding evidence the victim was suicidal and expert testimony on "fight or flight" syndrome, which the court had allowed him to present in the first trial; (2) refusing his proposed instructions on constructive knowledge; (3) failing to sua sponte give a unanimity instruction; (4) instructing the jury under CALCRIM No. 2140; (5) refusing to allow him to reopen his case following closing arguments; and (6) ordering restitution as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.