O'GRADY

O'GRADY v. Superior Court

Good Law
139 Cal. App. 4th 1423·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 802·2006 Daily Journal DAR 6618·44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72·34 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2089
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2006H028579California22,700 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rushing, J.

Apple Computer, Inc. (Apple), a manufacturer of computer hardware and software, brought this action alleging that persons unknown caused the wrongful publication on the World Wide Web of Apple’s secret plans to release a device that would facilitate the creation of digital live sound recordings on Apple computers. In an effort to identify the source of the disclosures, Apple sought and obtained authority to issue civil subpoenas to the publishers of the Web sites where the information appeared and to the e-mail service provider for one of the publishers. The publishers moved for a protective order to prevent any such discovery. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that the publishers had involved themselves in the unlawful misappropriation of a trade secret. We hold that this was error because (1) the subpoena to the e-mail service provider cannot be enforced consistent with the plain terms of the federal Stored Communications Act ( 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2712 ); (2) any subpoenas seeking unpublished information from petitioners would be unenforceable through contempt proceedings in light of the California reporter’s shield (Cal. Const., art. I, § 2, subd. (b);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.