Weinstein

Weinstein v. Department of Transportation

Bad Law
139 Cal. App. 4th 52·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 648·2006 Daily Journal DAR 5331·42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 417·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3679
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 2006H028124California3,314 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mihara, J.

Plaintiffs Gary Weinstein and Ryan Mitchell were injured in a cross-median collision on Highway 101 and sought to hold defendant California Department of Transportation liable for their injuries on the ground that the accident location was in a dangerous condition. Defendant obtained summary judgment based on design immunity, and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm the judgment.

I. Background

The operative complaint is plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. Plaintiffs alleged that, on December 6, 2001, a northbound vehicle crossed over the Highway 101 median .2 miles north of Burnett Avenue in the City of Morgan Hill and collided with a southbound vehicle. The driver of the northbound vehicle was killed. Plaintiffs were injured.

Plaintiffs alleged that defendant was liable under Government Code section 835, subdivision (b) for their injuries because the accident location was dangerous. They asserted that a “lane drop” occurred at that location “without warning” with “both horizontal and vertical sight distance restrictions,” and “cyclone fencing” in the median was “inadequate to prevent cross-over accidents.”

Defendant filed an answer in which it alleged that it was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.