Coffin

Coffin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

Good Law
139 Cal. App. 4th 471·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 699·2006 Daily Journal DAR 5723·43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 420·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3910
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 2006D047218California3,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Rourke, J.

Review of a decision of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board affirming a decision of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to grant a liquor license to the Barona Tribal Gaming authority. Decision annulled and matter remanded.

This appeal addresses the following question: which party—the applicant or the protestant—bears the burden of proof during a hearing held by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Department) regarding an applicant’s petition for a liquor license. The Department, in a decision affirmed by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (Board), placed the burden on the protestants, and granted a liquor license to the Barona Tribal Gaming Authority over the protestants’ objections. We disagree and hold that the applicant bears the burden of proof regarding the applicant’s eligibility for a liquor license from the start of the application process until the Department makes a final determination. Accordingly, the Board’s decision is annulled and the matter remanded.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

In September 2002, Barona applied for an on-sale general liquor license. In early 2004, the Department’s investigator prepared a report…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.