CHAPALA MANAGEMENT CORP. v. Stanton

Good Law
113 Cal. Rptr. 3d 617·186 Cal. App. 4th 1532·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1257
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2010D055532California6,335 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Rourke, J.

Defendants and appellants Thomas Stanton and Donna Stanton replaced two windows in their condominium with “sandtone” colored windows after the condominium association, Chapala Management Corporation (Association), had denied their application for those improvements on grounds they were not an approved color. Association thereafter filed suit and, following a bench trial, obtained a judgment against the Stantons for injunctive and declaratory relief declaring them in violation of Association’s amended and restated declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R’s) and requiring them to modify or replace their windows under the approval of Association’s architectural review committee (at times hereafter the ARC). The trial court ordered the Stantons to pay attorney fees and thereafter ordered them to post a bond or undertaking to stay the collection of the attorney fee award. The Stantons appealed from the judgment without filing an appeal bond or other undertaking.

On appeal from the judgment, the Stantons contend the trial court erred by (1) granting an injunction when Association had specific and adequate legal remedies under the CC&R’s; (2) ignoring Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.