Kirby

Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.

Good Law
113 Cal. Rptr. 3d 37·186 Cal. App. 4th 1361·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1223·19 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 178
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 2010C062306California6,989 words

Opinion

Opinion

This appeal challenges an award of attorney's fees to an employer who successfully defended against allegations of labor law violations brought by two former employees. Appellants Anthony Kirby and Rick Leech, Jr. (collectively Kirby), sued respondent Immoos Fire Protection, Inc. (Immoos), as well as 750 Doe defendants for violating various labor laws as well as the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.). Kirby dismissed the case after the trial court denied class certification. The court subsequently awarded $49,846.05 in attorney's fees to Immoos for its defense of the first, sixth and seventh causes of action.

For reasons that follow, we shall reverse the award of attorney's fees and remand to the trial court with directions to award Immoos reasonable fees for its defense of the sixth cause of action only.

We begin by setting forth the allegations in the operative complaint. In August 2007, Kirby filed an amended complaint that alleged six causes of action against Immoos, and a seventh that named 750 Doe defendants but omitted Immoos as a party.

The first cause of action alleged that Immoos engaged in 12 enumerated instances of unlawful and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.