Wong

People v. Wong

Good Law
113 Cal. Rptr. 3d 384·186 Cal. App. 4th 1433·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1228
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2010B212580California7,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashmann-Gerst, J.

The story of Leland Wong (Wong) is one of graft and hubris. Wrongly believing he could get away with lying, cheating and stealing, he ended up convicted of multiple crimes, including embezzling money (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)), accepting a bribe (§ 68), acting with a conflict of interest (Gov. Code, § 1090), and committing perjury (§ 118). He appeals and assigns error on the theory that the embezzlement convictions are barred by the statute of limitations, and the bribery, conflict of interest and perjury convictions are not supported by sufficient evidence. Among other questions presented by this appeal is the following: Is it legal for a commissioner in one city department to take money from a third party to influence contract negotiations with a different department in the same city? The answer is no. After review, we conclude that the challenged convictions must stand.

FACTS

Embezzlement from Kaiser Foundation Health Plan

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (Kaiser) operated as a nonprofit entity. For 17 years, Wong worked for Kaiser as the Southern California director of community and government relations. He had an annual budget of about $9 million, and his job was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.