Heck

Essex Insurance v. Heck

Good Law
112 Cal. Rptr. 3d 915·186 Cal. App. 4th 1513·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1256
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2010F058139California7,147 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gomes, J.

What the heck?!? At one point, the trial court commented, “This is one of the most screwed up cases I’ve ever seen.” We heartily agree. Essex Insurance Company provided a defense to a defendant in a personal injury action who was not its named insured, but did not discover its mistake until after judgment was entered following a jury verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. Litigation ensued over Essex’s obligation to pay the judgment. Essex eventually entered into a global settlement with the plaintiff that resulted in the dismissal of three lawsuits, including the personal injury action and a bad faith action plaintiff brought against Essex, in exchange for a lump sum payment. The settlement agreement did not allocate the payment among the three lawsuits or resolve issues regarding the identity of Essex’s insured.

Essex then sought indemnity from Dr. Richard Heck, who had treated the plaintiff in the personal injury action, through equitable subrogation, for his proportionate liability for the amount Essex paid in settlement. Dr. Heck filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted on the basis that Essex had waived any claim for equitable subrogation. In a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.