Busser

People v. Busser

Good Law
113 Cal. Rptr. 3d 536·186 Cal. App. 4th 1503·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1254
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 20, 2010D055088California2,597 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Scott Busser appeals an order requiring him to pay restitution to his insurance carrier after he pleaded guilty to misdemeanor hit and run (Veh. Code, § 20002, subd. (a)) and to presenting a materially false statement to his insurance company (Pen. Code, § 550, subd. (b)(1)), a felony. Busser’s insurer, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), paid the repair costs from an accident involving Busser but later discovered Busser had lied about the circumstances of the accident. When he lied, Busser violated the terms of the insurance policy and provided GEICO with grounds to rescind the contract. However, GEICO would have been contractually obligated to pay all the repair costs from the collision if Busser had not lied about the facts of the accident. Thus, Busser’s misrepresentation did not actually induce GEICO to provide coverage where there was none or to pay more in repair costs than it was otherwise obligated to pay under the contract. Nevertheless, the trial court ordered Busser to pay restitution to GEICO under subdivision (a)(3)(B) of section 1202.4 for the repair costs from the accident. We conclude, based on the rule first stated in People v. Crow (1993) 6…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.