Bury

People v. Bury

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 32·41 Cal. App. 4th 1194·49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 107·96 Daily Journal DAR 551·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 360
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 1996B086381California4,127 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

Brian Keith Bury appeals his conviction by a jury of felony driving under the influence of alcohol. (Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (a).) He contends his conviction must be reversed due to the improper admission of the results of a preliminary alcohol screening (PAS) test administered to him at the scene of his arrest. A PAS device is a breath-testing instrument used to determine either the presence or concentration of alcohol in a person’s blood. Such device may be used by police, but is not required, in order to make a preliminary determination of sobriety prior to arrest. (§23157, subd. (h).) A PAS test is differentiated from mandated chemical testing of a suspect’s blood-alcohol level (BAL) after a lawful arrest under the implied consent law. (§23157, subd. (a)(1); 72 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 226 , 227, 229 (1989).)

We rule the PAS test evidence introduced at appellant’s trial was admissible.

Facts

At 1:40 a.m. on February 10, 1994, California Highway Patrol Officer David Hall was on patrol with his partner Officer Pedro Leon on highway 101 when they noticed an automobile traveling in the left-hand lane at 45 miles per hour. The vehicle then was driven across three lanes and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.