In Re John W.

Bad Law
41 Cal. App. 4th 961·48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 899
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 1996G016695California6,600 words

Opinion

Opinion

Harold LaFlamme and Jess Ann Hite, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J. —

This is a bitter child custody case which became a juvenile dependency case on the strength of unproved allegations of child molestation. After more than a year in the juvenile dependency system, during which there was no finding of abuse, the juvenile court terminated its jurisdiction over the small child, John W., but split physical custody between both parents, requiring John to be shuttled every two weeks between northern Los Angeles County and southern Orange County. The father, Philip, the parent aggrieved by the false allegations of abuse, now appeals from that order, contending that in light of all the circumstances — particularly evidence that the mother, Michelle, coached and bribed her child into making the allegations — the juvenile court should have awarded physical custody to him. Like the child molestation allegations against the father, the allegations of coaching and bribery against the mother were never found true. Michelle also joins Philip in challenging an order precluding either party from attempting to modify its custody order in the family court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.