California State Electronics Ass'n v. Zeos International Ltd.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 34·41 Cal. App. 4th 1270·49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 127·96 Daily Journal DAR 599·28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1207
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 1996B086059California2,687 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fukuto, J.

This action was brought to compel compliance with the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act’s requirement that manufacturers of goods sold in California with express warranties provide for local repair facilities to fulfill those warranties. (Civ. Code, § 1793.2, subd. (a)(1)(A).) Defendant Zeos International Ltd. (Zeos), a non-California manufacturer and mail-order distributor of personal computers, moved for summary judgment on grounds the requirement did not apply to it, because its sales are not made in California, or alternatively that the statute was invalid because in conflict with the commerce clause of the United States Constitution and a federal statute. The trial court pretermitted the question of the section’s applicability to Zeos, and granted summary judgment on grounds the law was unconstitutional. On plaintiff’s present appeal, Zeos reasserts all of the reasons for summary judgment it adduced below. We conclude that Zeos was entitled to judgment because the section did not apply to its sales. We therefore affirm the judgment without reaching the constitutional issues, which the trial court should not have decided.

Statement

Plaintiff California State…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.