Hagen

Hagen v. Hickenbottom

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1244·41 Cal. App. 4th 168·48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 197·95 Daily Journal DAR 16870·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9745
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1995H012841California7,405 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.

Mayme I. Hagen died in 1991, at the age of 96. Her two grandchildren, Michael and Amy Hagen, were her only surviving issue; her only child, John Hagen (the grandchildren’s father) had died in 1980. In 1988 the decedent had executed a revocable living trust, supplemented by a pour-over will, which gave almost all of her property to her cousin, Terry Hickenbottom, upon the death of the decedent. After the decedent died the grandchildren brought this action against Hickenbottom, individually and as trustee of the 1988 trust, to set aside the trust upon the theory that Hickenbottom had exercised undue influence over the decedent, and for damages. The trial court granted Hickenbottom’s motion for summary judgment, and entered a judgment awarding costs to Hickenbottom. The grandson, Michael Hagen, alone appeals; because the granddaughter, Amy Hagen, has not appealed, the judgment against her is final for all purposes.

Review of a summary judgment involves pure questions of law—the legal significance of the documents upon which the trial court acted—which we review independently. (Saldana v. Globe-Weis Systems Co. (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 1505, 1513-1515 [ 285 Cal.Rptr. 385 ];…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.