Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 56·41 Cal. App. 4th 1538·49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 271·96 Daily Journal DAR 827·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 564
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 1996B087655California4,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grignon, J.

Defendant and appellant The Maryland Casualty Company appeals from the judgment entered against it and in favor of plaintiff and respondent The Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois. This case involves a motor vehicle liability insurance coverage dispute arising out of a loss for which both insurers concede coverage, but claim to afford excess rather than primary insurance. Pursuant to Insurance Code section 11580.9, subdivision (b), the policy covering a named insured “engaged in the business of renting or leasing motor vehicles without operators” is conclusively presumed to be excess if the motor vehicle involved is a commercial vehicle. We hold that a moving company which provides trailers to its independent contractor subhaulers is not “engaged in the business of renting or leasing motor vehicles without operators” within the meaning of section 11580.9, subdivision (b). Accordingly, we conclude the insurance of the moving company is primary. We therefore affirm.

Procedural Background

On November 5, 1990, a tractor-trailer operated by Peleti Siatuu, Jr., was involved in an accident which resulted in two consolidated personal injury actions. At the time of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.