Cutujian

Cutujian v. Benedict Hills Estates Assn.

Bad Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 47·41 Cal. App. 4th 1379·49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 166·96 Daily Journal DAR 730·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 460
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 1996Docket Nos. B083616, B086456California4,192 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

In these consolidated appeals, Eric K. Cutujian appeals from a judgment of dismissal after the sustaining without leave to amend of a demurrer to his third amended complaint for nuisance, and from an order after judgment awarding $30,000 in attorney fees, plus costs, to the defendant, Benedict Hills Estates Association (the Association). The trial court’s order was based on the conclusion that Cutujian’s complaint had not been filed within the relevant statutory period.

However, we conclude that the gravamen of Cutujian’s claim is based on the Association’s violation of a covenant running with the land and the statute of limitations did not commence to run until April of 1988 when Cutujian made a demand for performance under the covenant. Since Cutujian filed his complaint less than two years later, his action is timely and was improperly dismissed. We therefore reverse both the judgment and the award of attorney fees and costs.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1988, Cutujian and his brother jointly purchased a partially improved residential lot in Benedict Hills Estates (hereafter, BHE), a common interest residential development in the County of Los Angeles,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.