Waisbren

Waisbren v. Peppercorn Productions, Inc.

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1237·41 Cal. App. 4th 246·48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 437·95 Daily Journal DAR 16899·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9734
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1995B088448California6,131 words

Opinion

Opinion

Masterson, J.

In the entertainment industry, talent agents and personal managers perform valuable services for their clients. Talent agents, who seek to procure employment for artists, must be licensed under the Talent Agencies Act (Lab. Code, §§ 1700-1700.47). In contrast, personal managers, who advise and direct artists in the development of their careers, are not subject to any licensing requirements.

This appeal presents the question of whether a personal manager must be licensed under the Talent Agencies Act if he devotes an incidental portion of his business to the function of a talent agent—procuring employment for an artist. We conclude that he must be so licensed.

Background

Defendant Peppercorn Productions, Inc. (Peppercorn) is a California corporation specializing in the design and creation of puppets for use in the entertainment industry and advertising media. Peppercorn has also been involved in producing various television projects. Defendants David Pavelonis and Terrie Pavelonis are officers of Peppercorn.

In 1982, plaintiff Brad Waisbren agreed to promote Peppercorn. From 1982 through 1988, he performed numerous services for the company pursuant to an oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.