Doe
Doe v. Rafael Saravia
Opinion
Opinion
Wanger, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. [REDACTED]
2. Pursuant to Order of the Court dated September 18, 2003, for good cause shown, Plaintiff has brought this case under the pseudonym J. Doe.
3. [REDACTED]
4. Plaintiff justifiably believes that El Salvador remains an extremely dangerous country and that if his role in bringing this case were widely known, he Tymild be in danger. , >
5. The Plaintiff, justifiably believes that he could not bring this case in the Courts of El Salvador, because no criminal investigation and prosecution were ever completed to identify the perpetrators of the assassination of Archbishop Romero. Further,, based on the grant of amnesty to perpetrators, continuing unreliability of the Courts of El Salvador, including demonstrated hostility to imposing legal responsibility for the assassination of Archbishop Romero, Plaintiff justifiably believes that a-fair-and impartial hearing could not be received in the Courts of El Salvador.
6. The Plaintiff in good faith believes that he and his family, through the present time, may be subject to attacks for his role in this case and would not have brought the case except under the…