Chong

Chong v. California State Automobile Assn.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 771·48 Cal. App. 4th 285·55 Cal. Rptr. 2d 648·96 Daily Journal DAR 9775·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6006
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 1996A071782California800 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dossee, J.

In this declaratory relief action, a policyholder sought a declaration that the uninsured motorist provisions of her automobile liability insurance policy provide coverage for injuries she sustained as a pedestrian from a collision with a bicyclist. The only question for our review is whether a bicycle qualifies as a “motor vehicle.” We conclude it does not, and we affirm the judgment in favor of the insurer.

Facts

The facts are undisputed: Plaintiff was walking across Mission Street in San Francisco in a designated crosswalk on a green light when she was struck by a bicycle, which was traveling on Mission Street through the red light. Plaintiff was knocked to the ground and injured. As the bicycle rider was uninsured, plaintiff submitted a claim to her own automobile liability insurance carrier, California State Automobile Association (CSAA). Plaintiff’s policy provides uninsured motorist coverage for injuries sustained in an accident arising from the “ownership, maintenance or use of the uninsured motor vehicle.”

CSAA moved for summary judgment on the ground that a bicycle is not a “motor vehicle.” The trial court agreed and granted the motion. Judgment was entered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.