In Re Julie S.

Good Law
48 Cal. App. 4th 988·56 Cal. Rptr. 2d 19
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 1996B100598California798 words

Opinion

Opinion

[Opinion certified for partial publication. [*] ]

OPINION

TURNER, P.J. —

This appeal is from dependency proceedings under the Welfare and Institutions Code. [1] Laura S., the mother, appeals, following termination of her parental rights pursuant to section 366.26. On appeal, she raises issues concerning orders pursuant to section 366.22 terminating family reunification services, referring her minor daughter, Julie S., for adoptive planning, and setting the section 366.26 hearing. The mother previously filed a petition for extraordinary writ challenging the findings and orders pursuant to section 366.22. That petition was decided on the merits. Under these circumstances, the order setting a section 366.26 hearing is not appealable following the termination of parental rights. (§ 366.26, subd. ( l )(1); Cal. Rules of Court, [2] rules 39.1B(d), 1435(b), and 1436.5(c); see Guillermo G. v. Superior Court (1995) 33 Cal. App.4th 1168, 1172-1173 [ 39 Cal. Rptr.2d 748 ].) Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

.... .... .... .... .... .... .... . [*]

(1) As a matter of statutory law, an appeal from an order setting a section 366.26 hearing is only available if a petition for an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.